CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jingjiang rousi

Beijing dish of pork stir-fried with soya paste and served with leeks and doupi

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ549081
Source-derived summary

Jingjiang rousi (simplified Chinese: 京酱肉丝; traditional Chinese: 京醬肉絲; pinyin: Jīngjiàng ròusī), or sauteed shredded pork in sweet bean sauce, is a traditional dish in Beijing. Its main ingredient is pork tenderloin, which is stir-fried with soya paste or sweet soya paste for flavour. The dish is served with shredded leek (only using its white stalk) and doupi (dried tofu layer) to wrap. A vegetarian variant uses fried tofu puffs in place of pork.

It may be prepared and consumed wrapped in doupi, or rarely with bing. Some versions are prepared using hoisin sauce.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jingjiang rousi” as beijing dish of pork stir-fried with soya paste and served with leeks and doupi. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jingjiang, rousi and Beijing.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 93-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jingjiang, rousi and Beijing providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jingjiang rousi”, the useful work is to connect “beijing dish of pork stir-fried with soya paste and served with leeks and doupi” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q549081. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jingjiang rousi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jingjiang rousi primary sources, Jingjiang rousi archive and Jingjiang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jingjiang rousi”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Jingjiang rousi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.