CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Zhangnaoliao railway station

railway station in Zhuqi, Taiwan

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ11121256 ↗
Source-derived summary

Zhangnaoliao (Chinese: 樟腦寮車站; pinyin: Zhāngnǎoliáo Chēzhàn) is a railway station on the Alishan Forest Railway line located in Zhuqi Township, Chiayi County, Taiwan.

History

The station was opened on 1 October 1912. It used to be an important supplying place of camphor trees.

Architecture

The station is located 543 meters above sea level. It is a zig zag station.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Zhangnaoliao railway station” is railway station in Zhuqi, Taiwan. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Zhangnaoliao, railway and station, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1912—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1912-10-01. For this dossier, Zhangnaoliao, railway and station is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “railway station in Zhuqi, Taiwan” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11121256. Authority coordinates are 23.533, 120.603. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1912.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Zhangnaoliao railway station”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Zhangnaoliao railway station primary sources, Zhangnaoliao railway station archive and Zhangnaoliao research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Zhangnaoliao railway station”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Zhangnaoliao railway station” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.