CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Jennifer Sarvary Bradford

American political scientist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ119338461 ↗
Source-derived summary

Jennifer Sarvary Bradford is a Sweden-American lawyer and policy analyst who has served on the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Corruption and Economic Crime Branch since 2013. Bradford's work has aimed at quantifying and analyzing gender and corruption issues primarily on the African continent, resulting in the publication The Time is Now - Addressing the gender dimensions of corruption. She was recently named co-ordinator of UNODC's anti-corruption work in Africa.

Editorial summary

“Jennifer Sarvary Bradford” enters the record as american political scientist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Jennifer, Sarvary and Bradford can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Jennifer, Sarvary and Bradford.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Jennifer Sarvary Bradford” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Jennifer, Sarvary and Bradford provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q119338461. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jennifer Sarvary Bradford”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jennifer Sarvary Bradford primary sources, Jennifer Sarvary Bradford archive and Jennifer research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jennifer Sarvary Bradford”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Jennifer Sarvary Bradford” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.