Jean-Claude Delamétherie
French naturalist, mineralogist, geologist and paleontologist (1743-1817)
Jean-Claude Delamétherie (also de La Métherie, de Lamétherie, 4 September 1743 – 1 July 1817) was a French mineralogist, geologist and paleontologist.
Career
Delamétherie was born in La Clayette. He edited Journal de physique, de chimie, d'histoire naturelle et des arts from 1785. He was elected member of Leopoldina in 1792. He was a supporter of the French Revolution, but opposed to the Jacobins, and was forced to leave Paris during the Reign of Terror, interrupting publication of the Journal de physique until 1797.
Numerous minerals were first systematically described by Delamétherie.
In 1795, Delamétherie first described the Lherzolite (which he named after the site of its discovery, Étang de Lers in the Pyrenees).
Delamétherie was an advocate of transmutation of species. He was an atheist and materialist. Delamétherie held similar views to Jean-Baptiste Lamarck but differed on his views on the history of earth.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Jean-Claude Delamétherie” is french naturalist, mineralogist, geologist and paleontologist (1743-1817). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Jean-Claude, Delamétherie and French, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “french naturalist, mineralogist, geologist and paleontologist (1743-1817)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q653453. VIAF identifies the subject as 79028885. The Library of Congress control number is n84102385. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1743, 1817, 1785 and 1792.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Jean-Claude Delamétherie”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Jean-Claude Delamétherie primary sources, Jean-Claude Delamétherie archive and Jean-Claude research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jean-Claude Delamétherie”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Jean-Claude Delamétherie” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.