CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Janina Conceição

Brazilian volleyball player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ6154496 ↗
Source-derived summary

Janina Déia Chagas da Conceição (born 25 October 1972) is a Brazilian former volleyball player who competed for Brazil in the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta and 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney. She won the gold medal with the Women's National Team at the 1999 Pan American Games in Winnipeg. She participated at the 1999 FIVB World Cup in Japan.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Janina Conceição” as brazilian volleyball player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Janina, Conceição and Brazilian.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972, 1996, 2000, 1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Janina, Conceição and Brazilian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Janina Conceição”, the useful work is to connect “brazilian volleyball player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q6154496. The first chronological checks are 1972, 1996, 2000 and 1999.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Janina Conceição”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Janina Conceição primary sources, Janina Conceição archive and Janina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Janina Conceição”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Janina Conceição” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.