CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jamie Ding

American game show contestant

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ139178595
Source-derived summary

Jamie Ding (born May 1, 1992) is a New Jersey state government employee, law student and former game show contestant.

Ding won 31 consecutive games on Jeopardy! before he finally lost in April 2026 with $882,605 in winnings and the fifth-longest winning streak in the show's history.

He is known for wearing sweater outfits with orange, the school color of his alma mater, Princeton University.

On July 29, 2026, he and Ben Affleck became the fourth duo and the fifth celebrities overall to win the $1,000,000 top prize for their charity, Eastern Congo Initiative, and the eighteenth overall million-dollar winners on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.

To date, Ding is the sixteenth highest-earning game show contestant of all time, having accumulated a total of $1,385,605 on his game show appearances.

Early life and education

Born in Canberra, Australia on May 1, 1992, Ding is the son of a neuroscience professor and a high school math teacher who are immigrants from China. He grew up in Grosse Pointe Shores, a suburb of Detroit, Michigan and graduated from Grosse Pointe North High School in 2009.

As a student, he competed in geography bees and on his high school quiz bowl team. He lost a sixth-grade spelling bee when he misspelled the word "bolero" as "ballero."

He graduated from Princeton in 2013 with a degree in molecular biology and worked on The Daily Princetonian in multimedia.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jamie Ding” as american game show contestant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jamie, Ding and American.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992, 2026, 2009, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1992-05-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jamie, Ding and American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jamie Ding”, the useful work is to connect “american game show contestant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q139178595. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1992, 2026, 2009 and 2013.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jamie Ding”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jamie Ding primary sources, Jamie Ding archive and Jamie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jamie Ding”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Jamie Ding” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.