CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

James de Visme

English cricketer (1791-1859)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ16066143
Source-derived summary

James Edward de Visme (1791 – 12 November 1859) was an English cricketer associated with Marylebone Cricket Club who was active in the 1820s. He is recorded in one match in 1825, totalling 2 runs with a highest score of 1.

References

Bibliography

Haygarth, Arthur (1996) [1862]. Scores & Biographies, Volume 1 (1744–1826). Kennington: Frederick Lillywhite. ISBN 978-19-00592-23-9.

Haygarth, Arthur (1997) [1862]. Scores & Biographies, Volume 2 (1827–1840). Kennington: Frederick Lillywhite. ISBN 978-19-00592-23-9.

Editorial summary

“James de Visme” enters the record as english cricketer (1791-1859). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what James, Visme and English can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1791, 1859, 1825, 1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1791. Its strongest next move is a source search built around James, Visme and English.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“James de Visme” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, James, Visme and English provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16066143. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1791, 1859, 1825 and 1996.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “James de Visme”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow James de Visme primary sources, James de Visme archive and James research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “James de Visme”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from James de Visme” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.