James Woodhouse (chemist)
American surgeon and chemist (1770-1809)
James Woodhouse (17 November 1770 in Philadelphia – 4 June 1809 in Philadelphia) was an American surgeon and chemist.
Biography
He was the son of English emigrants to the British America. He graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1787, and from its medical department in 1792. In 1791 he served as a surgeon in General Arthur St. Clair's expedition against the Native American in the North West Territory. When Joseph Priestley declined to accept the chair of chemistry at the University of Pennsylvania in 1795, Woodhouse received the appointment, which he held until his death.
He is said to have been the first to demonstrate the superiority of the Lehigh anthracite coal in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, over the bituminous coals of Virginia for intensity and regularity of heating power. He also studied potassium, nitrous oxide, identification of basalt, starch and bread making. He was a member of the American Philosophical Society, and contributed to its transactions, to Samuel L. Mitchell's Medical Repository, and to John R. Coxe's Medical Museum.
Publications
Dissertation on the Chemical and Medical Properties of the Persimmon-Tree (1792)
Observations on the Combinations of Acids, Bitters, and Astringents (1793)
Answer to Dr.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “James Woodhouse (chemist)” is american surgeon and chemist (1770-1809). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through James, Woodhouse and chemist, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “american surgeon and chemist (1770-1809)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11206772. VIAF identifies the subject as 22923573. The Library of Congress control number is n79127001. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1770, 1809, 1787 and 1792.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “James Woodhouse (chemist)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow James Woodhouse (chemist) primary sources, James Woodhouse (chemist) archive and James research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “James Woodhouse (chemist)”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “James Woodhouse (chemist)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.