CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

James Brown (bowls)

Scottish lawn bowls player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ64624193 ↗
Source-derived summary

James Brown was a Scottish lawn bowls international who competed in the 1934 British Empire Games.

Bowls career

Brown was a member of the Kirkhill Bowls Club of Cambuslang.

At the 1934 British Empire Games he won the bronze medal in the rinks (fours) event with William Lowe, Charles Tait and James Morrison.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “James Brown (bowls)” is scottish lawn bowls player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through James, Brown and bowls, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1934—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, James, Brown and bowls is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “scottish lawn bowls player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q64624193. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1934.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “James Brown (bowls)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow James Brown (bowls) primary sources, James Brown (bowls) archive and James research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “James Brown (bowls)”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “James Brown (bowls)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.