Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie
academic journal

The Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie was a German scientific journal on chemistry, pharmacy and metallurgy, published from 1855 to at least 1935.
The journal changed its title several times. From 1855 to 1858 it was published as the Jahres-Bericht über die Fortschritte der chemischen Technologie für Fabrikanten, Chemiker, Pharmaceuten, Hütten- und Forstleute und Cameralisten and from 1859 to 1864 as the Jahres-Bericht über die Fortschritte und Leistungen der chemischen Technologie und technischen Chemie. It was edited by its founder Johannes Rudolf von Wagner until his death in 1880, then by Ferdinand Fischer. It was published by Otto Wigand of Leipzig.
References
Further reading
Reichardt, E. (1882). "Rudolf v. Wagner's Jahresbericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gewerbestatistik für das Jahr 1881, fortgesetzt von Dr. Ferdinand Fischer. Leipzig, Otto Wiegand".
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie” as academic journal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as academic journal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 26, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q6123314. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1855, 1935, 1858 and 1859.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie primary sources, Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie archive and Jahres-Bericht research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Jahres-Bericht über die Leistungen der chemischen Technologie” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.