CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Rhys Frake-Waterfield

British film director

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ113679111
Source-derived summary

Rhys Frake-Waterfield (born 1991 or 1992) is an English filmmaker who became known for his 2023 independent horror film Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey and its 2024 sequel. It was the first theatrical film of his career, as well as the first for his company Jagged Edge Productions.

Early life

Frake-Waterfield is from Essex, where he also studied at the University of Essex.

Career

In 2021, Frake-Waterfield left his corporate strategy job at EDF Energy to create low-budget horror films, all released direct-to-video. After entering the film industry, he produced 36 feature films in two years. Though Frake-Waterfield started out as a visual effects artist, over time, he got into directing. The first film he directed was The Area 51 Incident, following a group of survivors at Area 51 who take shelter underground following an incident involving aliens emerging from a wormhole.

On 1 January 2022, the 1926 Winnie-the-Pooh book entered the public domain in the United States. Shortly after this, Jagged Edge Productions announced a Winnie-the-Pooh-based slasher film called Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey, with Frake-Waterfield serving as the director, writer, and co-producer with Scott Jeffrey. Though the film was originally intended for a direct-to-video release in October 2022, it developed an increased popularity on the internet which eventually led to the film receiving a theatrical release.

Editorial summary

“Rhys Frake-Waterfield” enters the record as british film director. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rhys, Frake-Waterfield and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1991, 1992, 2023, 2024—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1991. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Rhys, Frake-Waterfield and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Rhys Frake-Waterfield” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rhys, Frake-Waterfield and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q113679111. VIAF identifies the subject as 45172122710103162506. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1991, 1992, 2023 and 2024.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rhys Frake-Waterfield”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rhys Frake-Waterfield primary sources, Rhys Frake-Waterfield archive and Rhys research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rhys Frake-Waterfield”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Rhys Frake-Waterfield” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.