CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jacques E. Chelly

American physician

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ16727968 ↗
Source-derived summary

Jacques E. Chelly is an academic specializing in anesthesiology and acute pain management. He is currently a professor at the University of Pittsburgh with dual appointments in the Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. He is also Director of the Division known as the Acute Interventional Perioperative Pain Service (AIPPS) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). Chelly has authored over 150 publications since 1979, and continues to be one of the leading investigators in anesthesiology research. He is currently the Vice Chair of Clinical Research at the UPMC.

Early life

Chelly was born is Paris, France.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jacques E. Chelly” as american physician. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jacques, Chelly and American.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jacques, Chelly and American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jacques E. Chelly”, the useful work is to connect “american physician” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16727968. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1979.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jacques E. Chelly”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jacques E. Chelly primary sources, Jacques E. Chelly archive and Jacques research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jacques E. Chelly”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Jacques E. Chelly” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.