CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jacobi sum

type of character sum

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 3, 2025
Entity authorityQ6119648
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, a Jacobi sum is a type of character sum formed with Dirichlet characters. Simple examples would be Jacobi sums J(χ, ψ) for Dirichlet characters χ, ψ modulo a prime number p, defined by

J

(

χ

,

ψ

)

=

χ

(

a

)

ψ

(

1

a

)

,

{\displaystyle J(\chi ,\psi )=\sum \chi (a)\psi (1-a)\,,}

where the summation runs over all residues a = 2, 3, ..., p − 1 mod p (for which neither a nor 1 − a is 0). Jacobi sums are the analogues for finite fields of the beta function. Such sums were introduced by C. G. J. Jacobi early in the nineteenth century in connection with the theory of cyclotomy. Jacobi sums J can be factored generically into products of powers of Gauss sums g. For example, when the character χψ is nontrivial,

J

(

χ

,

ψ

)

=

g

(

χ

)

g

(

ψ

)

g

(

χ

ψ

)

,

{\displaystyle J(\chi ,\psi )={\frac {g(\chi )g(\psi )}{g(\chi \psi )}}\,,}

analogous to the formula for the beta function in terms of gamma functions. Since the nontrivial Gauss sums g have absolute value p1⁄2, it follows that J(χ, ψ) also has absolute value p1⁄2 when the characters χψ, χ, ψ are nontrivial. Jacobi sums J lie in smaller cyclotomic fields than do the nontrivial Gauss sums g. The summands of J(χ, ψ) for example involve no pth root of unity, but rather involve just values which lie in the cyclotomic field of (p − 1)th roots of unity. Like Gauss sums, Jacobi sums have known prime ideal factorisations in their cyclotomic fields; see Stickelberger's theorem.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jacobi sum” as type of character sum. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jacobi, type and character.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 278-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jacobi, type and character providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jacobi sum”, the useful work is to connect “type of character sum” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q6119648. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jacobi sum”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jacobi sum primary sources, Jacobi sum archive and Jacobi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jacobi sum”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Jacobi sum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.