CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jackal or Tiger?

Indian fairy tale

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ6116053 ↗
Source-derived summary

'Jackal or Tiger?' is an Indian fairy tale featured in The Olive Fairy Book. It is story about a kind-hearted holy man who helps a tiger out of a trap, but is then threatened by the tiger, who turns on him. He is ultimately rescued by a clever jackal. Different versions of the same theme have been told to children in different parts of India.

It is said that 'Jackal or Tiger?' was collected in the 19th century by Joseph Jacobs, an Australian-born man who came to England. The moral of the story is that appearances can be deceptive.

Synopsis

A king and queen, in bed at night, heard a howl. The king thought it was a tiger, and the queen a jackal. They argued. The king said that if it were a jackal, he would leave the kingdom to her; if it were a tiger, he would send her away and marry another woman.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Jackal or Tiger?” as indian fairy tale. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 155-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Jackal, Tiger and Indian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as indian fairy tale. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6116053. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jackal or Tiger?”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jackal or Tiger? primary sources, Jackal or Tiger? archive and Jackal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jackal or Tiger?”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Jackal or Tiger?” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.