Journal of Modern Dynamics
journal
The Journal of Modern Dynamics is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of mathematics published by the American Institute of Mathematical Sciences with the support of the Anatole Katok Center for Dynamical Systems and Geometry (Pennsylvania State University). The editor-in-chief is Giovanni Forni (University of Maryland College Park).
History
The journal was established in 2007 with Anatole Katok as the founding editor-in-chief. It covers the theory of dynamical systems with particular emphasis on the mutual interaction between dynamics and other major areas of mathematical research: number theory, symplectic geometry, differential geometry, rigidity, quantum chaos, Teichmüller theory, geometric group theory, and harmonic analysis on manifolds. Until 2015 the journal was published quarterly. Since then, accepted papers are published online first and a single printed volume is published yearly.
Abstracting and indexing
The journal is abstracted and indexed in:
Current Contents/Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
EBSCO databases
MathSciNet
Science Citation Index Expanded
Scopus
Zentralblatt MATH
According to MathSciNet, the journal has a 2018 Mathematical Citation Quotient of 0.89.
The public source identifies “Journal of Modern Dynamics” as journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Journal, Modern and Dynamics.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Journal of Modern Dynamics”, the useful work is to connect “journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 1, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15441546. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2007, 2015 and 2018.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Journal of Modern Dynamics”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Journal of Modern Dynamics primary sources, Journal of Modern Dynamics archive and Journal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Journal of Modern Dynamics”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Journal of Modern Dynamics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.