CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation

First Nations Modern Treaty Government

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ259919
Source-derived summary

The Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation (Nuu-chah-nulth pronunciation: [juːɬuʔiɬʔatħ]) or Ucluelet First Nation is the modern treaty government of the Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ in the Canadian province of British Columbia (located on the west coast of Vancouver Island on the northwest side of Barkley Sound).

History

Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ have lived on the west coast of Vancouver Island for thousands of years. Today’s nation comprises the descendants from the families that in the past occupied 9 different villages in the Barkley Sound area: hitaču, ƛakmaqis, ʔuuc, k̓ʷinaqułtḥ, namint, yuułuʔił, w̓aayi, huʔuł, and kʷisitis. Each of the villages historically had one longhouse for summer and winter usage.

Resource harvesting across Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ territory followed a seasonal round. Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ were fishers and whalers, with salmon being the most sustainable resource. Large quantities would be harvested in the fall and then stored throughout the winter months. The food resources spread across Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ territory were diverse, including salmon and salmon roe, herring and herring roe, cod, halibut, sardines, seals, sea lions, whales, sea urchin, crab, clams, mussels, oysters, deer, bear, elk, wild plants and roots. As with salmon, many of these foods were preserved by way of drying and smoking.

The earliest contact Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ had with Europeans was in the 1770s, as fur traders entered the region.

Editorial summary

“Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation” enters the record as first Nations Modern Treaty Government. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ, First and Nation can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 206-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ, First and Nation.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ, First and Nation provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q259919. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation primary sources, Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation archive and Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Yuułuʔiłʔatḥ First Nation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.