CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal)

scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 26, 2024
Entity authorityQ27710835 ↗
Source-derived summary

Experimental Biology and Medicine was a peer-reviewed academic journal of biology and medicine published by Karger Publishers from 1967 to 1987. The publication resumed as Issues in Biomedicine from 1990 to 1991, until its cessation. The journal was indexed in Index Medicus.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal)” as scientific journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Experimental, Biology and Medicine.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1967, 1987, 1990, 1991—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Experimental, Biology and Medicine providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal)”, the useful work is to connect “scientific journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 26, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q27710835. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1967, 1987, 1990 and 1991.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal) primary sources, Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal) archive and Experimental research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal)”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Experimental Biology and Medicine (Karger journal)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.