CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Irving H.C. Tai

Taiwanese politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ16239667 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tai Hao-chun (Chinese: 戴豪君; pinyin: Dài Háojūn), also known by his English name Irving H. C. Tai, is a Taiwanese politician. He was the Deputy Minister of the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission of the Executive Yuan until 21 January 2014.

Education

Tai received his bachelor's degree in law from Soochow University School of Law, master's in law from Tamkang University and doctorate in European studies from Tamkang University.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Irving H.C. Tai” is taiwanese politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Irving, Taiwanese and politician, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Irving, Taiwanese and politician is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “taiwanese politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16239667. VIAF identifies the subject as 169177036. The Library of Congress control number is n2011017481. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Irving H.C. Tai”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Irving H.C. Tai primary sources, Irving H.C. Tai archive and Irving research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Irving H.C. Tai”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Irving H.C. Tai” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.