Cyclic code
block code where the circular shifts of each codeword gives another word that belongs to the code

In coding theory, a cyclic code is a block code, where the circular shifts of each codeword gives another word that belongs to the code. They are error-correcting codes that have algebraic properties that are convenient for efficient error detection and correction.
Definition
Let
C
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}
be a linear code over a finite field (also called Galois field)
G
F
(
q
)
{\displaystyle GF(q)}
of block length
n
{\displaystyle n}
.
C
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}
is called a cyclic code if, for every codeword
c
=
(
c
1
,
…
,
c
n
)
{\displaystyle c=(c_{1},\ldots ,c_{n})}
from
C
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}
, the word
(
c
n
,
c
1
,
…
,
c
n
−
1
)
{\displaystyle (c_{n},c_{1},\ldots ,c_{n-1})}
in
G
F
(
q
)
n
{\displaystyle GF(q)^{n}}
obtained by a cyclic right shift of components is again a codeword. Because one cyclic right shift is equal to
n
−
1
{\displaystyle n-1}
cyclic left shifts, a cyclic code may also be defined via cyclic left shifts. Therefore, the linear code
C
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}}
is cyclic precisely when it is invariant under all cyclic shifts.
Cyclic codes have some additional structural constraint on the codes. They are based on Galois fields and because of their structural properties they are very useful for error controls. Their structure is strongly related to Galois fields because of which the encoding and decoding algorithms for cyclic codes are computationally efficient.
Algebraic structure
Cyclic codes can be linked to ideals in certain rings.
“Cyclic code” enters the record as block code where the circular shifts of each codeword gives another word that belongs to the code. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cyclic, code and block can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Cyclic code” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cyclic, code and block provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q245464. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Cyclic code”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Cyclic code primary sources, Cyclic code archive and Cyclic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cyclic code”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Cyclic code” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.