CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc

Romanian bobsledder

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 14, 2024
Entity authorityQ6061778 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc (born June 20, 1984) is a Romanian bobsledder from Suceava who has competed since 2005. Competing in two Winter Olympics, he earned his best finish of 15th in the four-man event at Vancouver in 2010.

At the FIBT World Championships, Dovalciuc earned his best finish of 11th in the two-man event at St. Moritz in 2007.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc” as romanian bobsledder. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 2005, 2010, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1984-06-20. The account is most persuasive where Ioan, Dănuț and Dovalciuc can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as romanian bobsledder. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 14, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6061778. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1984, 2005, 2010 and 2007.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc primary sources, Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc archive and Ioan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ioan Dănuț Dovalciuc” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.