Invariance of domain
theorem in topology about homeomorphic subsets of Euclidean space

Invariance of domain is a theorem in topology about homeomorphic subsets of Euclidean space
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
.
It states:
If
U
{\displaystyle U}
is an open subset of
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
and
f
:
U
→
R
n
{\displaystyle f:U\rightarrow \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
is an injective continuous map, then
V
:=
f
(
U
)
{\displaystyle V:=f(U)}
is open in
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
and
f
{\displaystyle f}
is a homeomorphism between
U
{\displaystyle U}
and
V
{\displaystyle V}
.
The theorem and its proof are due to L. E. J. Brouwer, published in 1912.
The proof uses tools of algebraic topology, notably the Brouwer fixed point theorem.
Notes
The conclusion of the theorem can equivalently be formulated as: "
f
{\displaystyle f}
is an open map".
Normally, to check that
f
{\displaystyle f}
is a homeomorphism, one would have to verify that both
f
{\displaystyle f}
and its inverse function
f
−
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}}
are continuous;
the theorem says that if the domain is an open subset of
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
and the image is also in
R
n
,
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n},}
then continuity of
f
−
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}}
is automatic.
Furthermore, the theorem says that if two subsets
U
{\displaystyle U}
and
V
{\displaystyle V}
of
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
are homeomorphic, and
U
{\displaystyle U}
is open, then
V
{\displaystyle V}
must be open as well.
(Note that
V
{\displaystyle V}
is open as a subset of
R
n
,
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n},}
and not just in the subspace topology.
Openness of
V
{\displaystyle V}
in the subspace topology is automatic.)
Both of these statements are not at all obvious and are not generally true if one leaves Euclidean space.
It is of crucial importance that both domain and image of
f
{\displaystyle f}
are contained in Euclidean space of the same dimension.
“Invariance of domain” enters the record as theorem in topology about homeomorphic subsets of Euclidean space. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Invariance, domain and theorem can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Invariance of domain” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Invariance, domain and theorem provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3527201. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1912.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Invariance of domain”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Invariance of domain primary sources, Invariance of domain archive and Invariance research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Invariance of domain”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Invariance of domain” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.