CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Epistasis

phenomenon where the effect of one gene (locus) is dependent on the presence of one or more modifier genes, its genetic background

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ751748 ↗
Source-derived summary

Epistasis is a phenomenon in genetics in which the effect of a mutation on a trait is dependent on the presence or absence of mutations at different loci (locations on the genome), that may be on the same gene (intragenic) or on different genes, called modifier genes. In evolutionary genetics, epistasis occurs when the combined effect of two mutations is different from what you would expect by simply adding their individual effects together. This definition can be expanded to more than two loci to study higher-order epistasis, which plays an important role in shaping evolutionary trajectories.

The term epistasis was introduced in 1907 to describe the discrepancy between the prediction of segregation ratios based on the action of individual genes and the actual outcome of a dihybrid cross, and is now widely used in biochemistry, computational biology and evolutionary biology. While the nuanced meaning of the term now differs between researchers studying genetics at a functional, compositional, or at a statistical level, it still describes gene interactions at various levels.

History

Understanding of epistasis has changed considerably through the history of genetics and so too has the use of the term. The term was first used in 1907 by William Bateson and his collaborators Florence Durham and Muriel Wheldale Onslow. In early models of natural selection devised in the early 20th century, each gene was considered to make its own characteristic contribution to fitness, against an average background of other genes. Some introductory courses still teach population genetics this way. Because of the way that the science of population genetics was developed, evolutionary geneticists have tended to think of epistasis as the exception.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Epistasis” is phenomenon where the effect of one gene (locus) is dependent on the presence of one or more modifier genes, its genetic background. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Epistasis, phenomenon and where, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1907—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Epistasis, phenomenon and where is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “phenomenon where the effect of one gene (locus) is dependent on the presence of one or more modifier genes, its genetic background” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q751748. The Library of Congress control number is sh99011759. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1907.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Epistasis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Epistasis primary sources, Epistasis archive and Epistasis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Epistasis”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Epistasis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.