Intervention in School and Clinic
journal
Intervention in School and Clinic is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes papers in the field of education. The journal's editors are Randall Boone (University of Nevada, Las Vegas) and Kyle Higgins (University of Nevada, Las Vegas). It has been in publication since 1965 and is currently published by SAGE Publications in association with the Hammill Institute on Disabilities.
Scope
Intervention in School and Clinic publishes articles which focus on social, behavioral, assessment, and vocational strategies and techniques that have a direct application to classroom settings. The journal aims to equip teachers with tips, techniques, methods and ideas for improving assessment, instruction and management for individuals with learning disabilities or behavior disorders.
Abstracting and indexing
Intervention in School and Clinic is abstracted and indexed in, among other databases, SCOPUS and the Social Sciences Citation Index. According to the Journal Citation Reports, its 2017 impact factor is 0.578, ranking it 38 out of 40 journals in the category ‘Education, Special’.
“Intervention in School and Clinic” enters the record as journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Intervention, School and Clinic can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Intervention in School and Clinic” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Intervention, School and Clinic provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6057351. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1965 and 2017.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Intervention in School and Clinic”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Intervention in School and Clinic primary sources, Intervention in School and Clinic archive and Intervention research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Intervention in School and Clinic”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Intervention in School and Clinic” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.