CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Intersection theory

branch of algebraic geometry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 8, 2025
Entity authorityQ15176852
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, intersection theory is one of the main branches of algebraic geometry, where it gives information about the intersection of two subvarieties of a given variety. The theory for varieties is older, with roots in Bézout's theorem on curves and elimination theory. On the other hand, the topological theory more quickly reached a definitive form.

There is yet an ongoing development of intersection theory. Currently the main focus is on: virtual fundamental cycles, quantum intersection rings, Gromov–Witten theory and the extension of intersection theory from schemes to stacks.

Topological intersection form

For a connected oriented manifold

M

{\displaystyle M}

of dimension

2

n

{\displaystyle 2n}

the intersection form is defined on the

n

{\displaystyle n}

-th cohomology group (what is usually called the 'middle dimension') by the evaluation of the cup product on the fundamental class

[

M

]

{\displaystyle [M]}

in

H

2

n

(

M

,

M

)

{\displaystyle H_{2n}(M,\partial M)}

. Stated precisely, there is a bilinear form

λ

M

:

H

n

(

M

,

M

)

×

H

n

(

M

,

M

)

Z

{\displaystyle \lambda _{M}\colon H^{n}(M,\partial M)\times H^{n}(M,\partial M)\to \mathbf {Z} }

given by

λ

M

(

a

,

b

)

=

a

b

,

[

M

]

Z

{\displaystyle \lambda _{M}(a,b)=\langle a\smile b,[M]\rangle \in \mathbf {Z} }

with

λ

M

(

a

,

b

)

=

(

1

)

n

λ

M

(

b

,

a

)

Z

.

{\displaystyle \lambda _{M}(a,b)=(-1)^{n}\lambda _{M}(b,a)\in \mathbf {Z} .}

This is a symmetric form for n even (so 2n = 4k doubly even), in which case the signature of M is defined to be the signature of the form, and an alternating form for n odd (so 2n = 4k + 2 is singly even). These can be referred to uniformly as ε-symmetric forms, where ε = (−1)n = ±1 respectively for symmetric and skew-symmetric forms. It is possible in some circumstances to refine this form to an ε-quadratic form, though this requires additional data such as a framing of the tangent bundle.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Intersection theory” as branch of algebraic geometry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 350-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Intersection, theory and branch can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as branch of algebraic geometry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q15176852. The Library of Congress control number is sh85067504. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Intersection theory”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Intersection theory primary sources, Intersection theory archive and Intersection research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Intersection theory”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Intersection theory” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.