CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Inter-processor interrupt

mechanism used between processors to maintain a sort of synchronization

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ827024
Source-derived summary

In computing, an inter-processor interrupt (IPI), also known as a shoulder tap, is a special type of interrupt by which one processor may interrupt another processor in a multiprocessor system if the interrupting processor requires action from the other processor. Actions that might be requested include:

Flush memory management unit caches, such as translation lookaside buffers, on other processors when memory mappings are changed by one processor;

Stop when the system is being shut down by one processor.

Notify an alternate CPU of a malfunction for Alternate CPU Recovery (ACR).

Notify a processor that higher-priority work is available.

Notify a processor of work that cannot be done on all processors due to, e.g.,

asymmetric access to I/O channels

special features on some processors

Mechanism

The M65MP option of OS/360 used the Direct Control feature of the S/360 to generate an interrupt on another processor; on S/370 and its successors, including z/Architecture, the SIGNAL PROCESSOR instruction provides a more formalized interface. The documentation for some IBM operating systems refers to this as a shoulder tap.

On IBM PC compatible computers that use the Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller (APIC), IPI signaling is often performed using the APIC. When a CPU wishes to send an interrupt to another CPU, it stores the interrupt vector and the identifier of the target's local APIC in the Interrupt Command Register (ICR) of its own local APIC. A message is then sent via the APIC bus to the target's local APIC, which then issues a corresponding interrupt to its own CPU.

Examples

Windows

In a multiprocessor system running Microsoft Windows, a processor may interrupt another processor for the following reasons, in addition to the ones listed above:

queue a DISPATCH_LEVEL interrupt to schedule a particular thread for execution;

kernel debugger breakpoint.

IPIs are given an IRQL of 29.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Inter-processor interrupt” is mechanism used between processors to maintain a sort of synchronization. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Inter-processor, interrupt and mechanism, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 301-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Inter-processor, interrupt and mechanism is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “mechanism used between processors to maintain a sort of synchronization” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q827024. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Inter-processor interrupt”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Inter-processor interrupt primary sources, Inter-processor interrupt archive and Inter-processor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Inter-processor interrupt”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Inter-processor interrupt” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.