Interpersonal perception
area of research in social psychology

Interpersonal perception is an area of research in social psychology which examines the beliefs that interacting people have about each other. This area differs from social cognition and person perception by being interpersonal rather than intrapersonal, and thus requiring the interaction of at least two actual people. There are three stages of the perception process including selection, organization, and interpretation.
Phenomena studied
accuracy – the correctness of A's beliefs about B
self-other agreement – whether A's beliefs about B matches B's beliefs about themself
similarity – whether A's and B's beliefs match
projection/assumed similarity – whether A's beliefs about B match A's beliefs about themself
reciprocity – the similarity of A's and B's beliefs about each other
meta-accuracy – whether A knows how others see them
assumed projection – whether A thinks others see them as they see them
These variables cannot be assessed in studies that ask people to form beliefs about fictitious targets.
Research
Although interest in this area has grown rapidly with the publication of Canadian journalist Malcolm Gladwell's 2005 book Blink and Nalini Ambady's "thin-slices" research, the discipline is still very young, having only been formally defined by David Kenny in 1994. The sparsity of research, in particular on the accuracy of first-impressions, means that social psychologists know a lot about what people think about others, but far less about whether they are right.
Many attribute this to a criticism that Lee Cronbach wrote in 1955 about how impression accuracy was calculated, which resulted in a 30-year hiatus in research. During that time, psychologists focused on consensus (whether A and B agree in their beliefs about C) rather than accuracy, although Kenny has argued that consensus is neither necessary nor sufficient for accuracy.
Today, the use of correlations instead of discrepancy scores to measure accuracy and the development of the Big Five model of personality have overcome Cronbach's criticisms and led to a wave of new research . People more accurately perceive extraversion and conscientiousness in strangers than they do the other personality domains.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Interpersonal perception” as area of research in social psychology. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as area of research in social psychology. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1525098. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005, 1994 and 1955.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Interpersonal perception”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Interpersonal perception primary sources, Interpersonal perception archive and Interpersonal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Interpersonal perception”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Interpersonal perception” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.