CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Auction (website)

online auction company based in South Korea

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ11261967
Source-derived summary

Auction Co. is an online auction company based in South Korea. It was acquired by eBay on January 8, 2001.

2008 Security Breach

In April 2008, the company revealed that their customers' real name, username, resident registration number, address, phone number, email address, bank account number, and purchase and refund log were breached in February. Originally, the victims were thought to be 11 million users, but later it was found that the private information of all members of Auction, 18,630,000 thousand people, was breached. Users filed a lawsuit against the company, but Court denied the responsibility of the company.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Auction (website)” as online auction company based in South Korea. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Auction, website and online.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001, 2008—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Auction, website and online providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Auction (website)”, the useful work is to connect “online auction company based in South Korea” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11261967. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001 and 2008.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Auction (website)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Auction (website) primary sources, Auction (website) archive and Auction research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Auction (website)”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Auction (website)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.