CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Institute for Political Ecology

is a Zagreb (Croatia) based research and educational organisation, which aspires to shape alternative development models and innovative democratic solutions for political and economic transformations of society

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ98554723 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Institute for Political Ecology (IPE; Croatian: Institut za političku ekologiju) is an ecology and sustainability think tank based in Zagreb, Croatia. Established on 10 June 2014, the institute conducts interdisciplinary research on environmental policy.

History

The IPE employs 21 team members, including junior researchers and fellows, an academic council, and a managing board directed by Vedran Horvat.

According to the IPE's mission statement, the institute's work on ecological economics has informed policy discussions through publications like Post-Growth Future(s): New Voices, Novel Visions. Key projects include the development of sustainability indicators and the Our Railways study on public transport democratization. The IPE also co-published Post-Growth Future(s) with the Green European Foundation.

The IPE's research focuses on ecological changes as drivers of social inequality and thematic work on climate justice per its mission statement. It organizes the Croatian Green Academy, a biannual event that aims to be a regional platform for green political discourse, held since 2010.

The IPE emphasizes degrowth as a core principle. The IPE is a member of the International Degrowth Network, where it engages in transnational advocacy and contributes academic support to the movement, notably through Federico Demaria's co-editorship of Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, a text on post-growth transitions.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Institute for Political Ecology” as is a Zagreb (Croatia) based research and educational organisation, which aspires to shape alternative development models and innovative democratic solutions for political and economic transformations of society. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Institute, Political and Ecology.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2014. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Institute, Political and Ecology providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Institute for Political Ecology”, the useful work is to connect “is a Zagreb (Croatia) based research and educational organisation, which aspires to shape alternative development models and innovative democratic solutions for political and economic transformations of society” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q98554723. None of the 4 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014 and 2010.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Institute for Political Ecology”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Institute for Political Ecology primary sources, Institute for Political Ecology archive and Institute research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Institute for Political Ecology”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Institute for Political Ecology” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.