Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic)
Czech think tank

The Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech: Institut Liberálních Studií) is a Czech public policy think tank based in Prague, which aims to promote the principles of classical liberalism. It is currently led by Martin Pánek. Previously known as the Liberal Institute, it was founded in its current form in July 2020 by Tomáš Pajonk, continuing the tradition of the defunct Liberal Institute founded in 1990. The institute publishes research promoting the ideas of classical liberalism as applied to the Czech and European political systems.
History
Liberal Institute
The F.A. Hayek Liberal Association was founded by Jiří Schwarz, Tomáš Ježek, and Miroslav Ševčík during the early stages of the Velvet Revolution in 1989. It was then registered on February 6, 1990, as the Liberal Institute. The institute has since been led by Miroslav Ševčík, Petr Koblovský, and Dominik Stroukal. Ševčík was deposed as director in 2013 and later expelled from the institute following controversy related to his tenure as dean of the Faculty of Economics at the Prague University of Economics and Business. He subsequently sued the institute to be reinstated.
During this period, six of the institute's fellows served as economic advisors to the Czech government.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic)” is czech think tank. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Institute, Liberal and Studies, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “czech think tank” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q130633342. Authority coordinates are 50.105, 14.391. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2020, 1990, 1989 and 2013.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic) primary sources, Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic) archive and Institute research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Institute for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.