Ink trap
a sharp recess in an inward corner, present in certain typefaces; when printed, ink fills them
An ink trap is a feature of certain typefaces designed for printing in small sizes. At an ink trap, the corners or details are removed from the letterforms. When the type is printed, ink naturally spreads into the removed area. Without ink traps, the excess ink would soak outward and ruin the crisp edge.
Ink traps are only needed for small point sizes and are usually only found on typefaces designed for printing on newsprint. Fonts of this kind are applicable for classifieds or telephone books. Typefaces with ink traps may be offered in versions without them for display on screen or at larger sizes.
Typefaces featuring ink traps include Retina (original MicroPlus variant), Bell Centennial, Tang and K2D.
Related to ink traps are light traps, which aim to improve the display of letterforms against the halation of cathode ray tube (CRT) displays. Light traps were developed in the late 1960s under the direction of Rudi Bass at the Graphic Arts Department of CBS News. To improve the legibility of the text in CBS's on-screen graphics, the department produced CBS News 36, a typeface with holes at the corners of the letterforms for light to bleed into.
The public source identifies “Ink trap” as a sharp recess in an inward corner, present in certain typefaces; when printed, ink fills them. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around trap, sharp and recess.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ink trap”, the useful work is to connect “a sharp recess in an inward corner, present in certain typefaces; when printed, ink fills them” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2635931. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ink trap”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ink trap primary sources, Ink trap archive and trap research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ink trap”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ink trap” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.