Plundering Time
Period of lawlessness in colonial Maryland (1644-1646)
The Plundering Time (1644–1646), also known as "Claiborne and Ingle's Rebellion", was a period of civil unrest and lawlessness in the English colony of the Province of Maryland. William Claiborne and Richard Ingle took opportunities to seize property and pillage in and around Kent Island and St. Mary's City, Maryland.
Causes of rebellion
The causes of the rebellion included William Claiborne's disputed claim with the Calverts over Kent Island, Maryland, bitter relations between the Catholic minority elite and the Protestant majority, and the political partisanship of the English Civil War.
The period was marked by the fall of the British King and religious intolerance, which led directly to the event.
Kent Island dispute (1638-1644)
In the winter of 1638-1639 (O.S./N.S.), the first provincial Maryland governor Leonard Calvert seized a trading post on Kent Island established by Captain William Claiborne.
In 1644, Claiborne led an uprising of Protestants and reclaimed the Island.
Richard Ingle's coup (1644-1646)
Although not officially allied, privateer Captain Richard Ingle seized the Kent Island opportunity to overthrow the government based at St. Mary's City. Catholic Governor Calvert escaped to Virginia.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Plundering Time” is period of lawlessness in colonial Maryland (1644-1646). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Plundering, Time and Period, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “period of lawlessness in colonial Maryland (1644-1646)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16933000. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1644, 1646, 1638 and 1639.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Plundering Time”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Plundering Time primary sources, Plundering Time archive and Plundering research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Plundering Time”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Plundering Time” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.