CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Affine Grassmannian

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ4688931
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the affine Grassmannian of an algebraic group G over a field k is an ind-scheme—a colimit of finite-dimensional schemes—which can be thought of as a flag variety for the loop group G(k((t))) and which describes the representation theory of the Langlands dual group LG through what is known as the geometric Satake correspondence.

Definition of Gr via functor of points

Let k be a field, and denote by

k

-Alg

{\displaystyle k{\text{-Alg}}}

and

S

e

t

{\displaystyle \mathrm {Set} }

the category of commutative k-algebras and the category of sets respectively. Through the Yoneda lemma, a scheme X over a field k is determined by its functor of points, which is the functor

X

:

k

-Alg

S

e

t

{\displaystyle X:k{\text{-Alg}}\to \mathrm {Set} }

which takes A to the set X(A) of A-points of X. We then say that this functor is representable by the scheme X. The affine Grassmannian is a functor from k-algebras to sets which is not itself representable, but which has a filtration by representable functors. As such, although it is not a scheme, it may be thought of as a union of schemes, and this is enough to profinitely apply geometric methods to study it.

Let G be an algebraic group over k. The affine Grassmannian GrG is the functor that associates to a k-algebra A the set of isomorphism classes of pairs (E, φ), where E is a principal homogeneous space for G over Spec A[[t]] and φ is an isomorphism, defined over Spec A((t)), of E with the trivial G-bundle G × Spec A((t)). By the Beauville–Laszlo theorem, it is also possible to specify this data by fixing an algebraic curve X over k, a k-point x on X, and taking E to be a G-bundle on XA and φ a trivialization on (X − x)A. When G is a reductive group, GrG is in fact ind-projective, i.e., an inductive limit of projective schemes.

Definition as a coset space

Let us denote by

K

=

k

(

(

t

)

)

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {K}}=k((t))}

the field of formal Laurent series over k, and by

O

=

k

[

[

t

]

]

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}=k[[t]]}

the ring of formal power series over k. By choosing a trivialization of E over all of

Spec

O

{\displaystyle \operatorname {Spec} {\mathcal {O}}}

, the set of k-points of GrG is identified with the coset space

G

(

K

)

/

G

(

O

)

{\displaystyle G({\mathcal {K}})/G({\mathcal {O}})}

.

References

Alexander Schmitt (11 August 2010).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Affine Grassmannian” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Affine, Grassmannian and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Affine, Grassmannian and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4688931. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Affine Grassmannian”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Affine Grassmannian primary sources, Affine Grassmannian archive and Affine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Affine Grassmannian”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Affine Grassmannian” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.