CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

The Linguist

journal of the Chartered Institute of Linguists

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ7747423 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Linguist (formerly The Incorporated Linguist) is the quarterly journal and magazine of the UK's Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL), whose headquarters is in London.

History and profile

The journal was established in 1962. The Linguist includes news about CIOL, articles on translation and interpreting, bilingualism and language use, as well as book reviews and current opinions.

The editor is Miranda Moore. The late Professor Peter Newmark was a regular contributor, whose wide-ranging column was entitled "Translation Now", as was Andrew Dalby with "Notes in the Margin".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “The Linguist” is journal of the Chartered Institute of Linguists. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Linguist, journal and Chartered, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1962—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1962-01-01. For this dossier, Linguist, journal and Chartered is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “journal of the Chartered Institute of Linguists” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7747423. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1962.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “The Linguist”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow The Linguist primary sources, The Linguist archive and Linguist research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Linguist”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “The Linguist” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.