CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

In Your House 10: Mind Games

1996 World Wrestling Federation pay-per-view event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ3797202 ↗
Source-derived summary

In Your House 10: Mind Games was a 1996 professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) event produced by the World Wrestling Federation (WWF, now WWE). It was the 10th In Your House and took place on September 22, 1996, at the CoreStates Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The name of the show was in reference to the rivalry between Shawn Michaels and Mankind.

The main event of the show saw Shawn Michaels retain the WWF Championship against Mankind in a match that Mankind regarded as the finest of his career. Also on the show, the Smoking Gunns defended the WWF Tag Team Championship against Owen Hart and the British Bulldog. On the undercard, former Olympian Mark Henry made his pay-per-view debut against Jerry "The King" Lawler.

In Your House 10: Mind Games was attended by 13,000 people and drew 120,000 buys (a 0.48 buy rate). In 2014, the event became available for streaming on the WWE Network.

Production

Background

In Your House was a series of monthly professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) events first produced by the World Wrestling Federation (WWF, now WWE) in May 1995. They aired when the promotion was not holding one of its then-five major PPVs (WrestleMania, King of the Ring, SummerSlam, Survivor Series, and Royal Rumble) and were sold at a lower cost.

Editorial summary

“In Your House 10: Mind Games” enters the record as 1996 World Wrestling Federation pay-per-view event. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Your, House and Mind can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 2014, 1995—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Your, House and Mind.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“In Your House 10: Mind Games” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Your, House and Mind provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3797202. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1996, 2014 and 1995.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “In Your House 10: Mind Games”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow In Your House 10: Mind Games primary sources, In Your House 10: Mind Games archive and Your research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “In Your House 10: Mind Games”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “In Your House 10: Mind Games” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.