CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Impossible object

two-dimensional figure representing a projection of a three-dimensional object that cannot exist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ601362
Source-derived summary

An impossible object (also known as an impossible figure or an undecidable figure) is a type of optical illusion that consists of a two-dimensional figure which is instantly and naturally understood as representing a projection of a three-dimensional object but cannot exist as a solid object. Impossible objects are of interest to psychologists, mathematicians and artists without falling entirely into any one discipline.

Notable examples

Notable impossible objects include:

Explanations

Impossible objects can be unsettling because of a human tendency in many cultures to interpret 2D drawings as three-dimensional objects. This is why a drawing of a Necker cube would most likely be seen as a cube, rather than "two squares connected with diagonal lines", "a square surrounded by irregular planar figures" or any other planar figure. Looking at different parts of an impossible object makes one reassess the 3D nature of the object, which confuses the mind.

In most cases the impossibility becomes apparent after viewing the figure for a few seconds. However, the initial impression of a 3D object remains even after it has been contradicted. There are also more subtle examples of impossible objects where the impossibility does not become apparent spontaneously and it is necessary to consciously examine the geometry of the implied object to determine that it is impossible.

Roger Penrose wrote about describing and defining impossible objects mathematically using the algebraic topology concept of cohomology.

History

An early example of an impossible object comes from Apolinère Enameled, a 1916 advertisement painted by Marcel Duchamp.

Editorial summary

“Impossible object” enters the record as two-dimensional figure representing a projection of a three-dimensional object that cannot exist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Impossible, object and two-dimensional can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1916—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Impossible, object and two-dimensional.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Impossible object” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Impossible, object and two-dimensional provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q601362. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1916.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Impossible object”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Impossible object primary sources, Impossible object archive and Impossible research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Impossible object”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Impossible object” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.