CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Imparatinho

Brazilian association football player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ9184215 ↗
Source-derived summary

Caetano Imparato (26 November 1898 – unknown), known as Imparatinho, was a Brazilian footballer who played for Palmeiras. He was capped once by the Brazil national football team in 1922, scoring two goals.

Career statistics

International

International goals

Scores and results list Brazil's goal tally first, score column indicates score after each Brazil goal.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Imparatinho” is brazilian association football player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Imparatinho, Brazilian and association, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1898, 1922—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Imparatinho, Brazilian and association is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “brazilian association football player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q9184215. The first chronological checks are 1898 and 1922.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Imparatinho”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Imparatinho primary sources, Imparatinho archive and Imparatinho research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Imparatinho”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Imparatinho” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.