CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Hypogymnia enteromorpha

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ10530332 ↗
Source-derived summary

Hypogymnia enteromorpha, the budding tube lichen or gut lichen, is a species of foliose lichen in the family Parmeliaceae. It is most often found in moist conifer forests of western North America, where it grows on bark and weathered wood. The species forms pale grey, hollow lobes with a black underside and commonly develops small bud-like outgrowths along the margins. It is one of the larger and more conspicuous members of its genus, and is frequently identified with chemical spot tests in addition to its characteristic growth form.

Taxonomy

The lichen was first formally described as a new species in 1803 by Erik Acharius, who named it Parmelia enteromorpha in his 1803 work Methodus qua omnes detectos lichenes. He set it apart from other "Parmelia" species by a combination of overall thallus form and underside coloration. He described a smooth, membranaceous thallus that is white above but black below, with crowded, overlapping lobes that are blunt at the tips and characteristically swollen or inflated. The apothecia were noted as brown and "very entire", i.e., with a neat, unbroken margin. Acharius also cited an earlier name, Lichen intestinalis D.J.E. Smith, indicating that he regarded Smith's concept as referring to the same lichen (or as part of the same circumscription). For locality, he gave "the western shores of boreal America" and credited Archibald Menzies as the collector.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Hypogymnia enteromorpha” as species of fungus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Hypogymnia, enteromorpha and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1803—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Hypogymnia, enteromorpha and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Hypogymnia enteromorpha”, the useful work is to connect “species of fungus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10530332. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1803.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Hypogymnia enteromorpha”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Hypogymnia enteromorpha primary sources, Hypogymnia enteromorpha archive and Hypogymnia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hypogymnia enteromorpha”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Hypogymnia enteromorpha” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.