CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

ILOVEYOU

computer worm

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ856096
Source-derived summary

ILOVEYOU, sometimes referred to as the Love Bug or Loveletter, was a computer worm that infected tens of millions of Windows computers following its release on 4 May 2000. The worm was mainly distributed through email attachments sent to contacts on an infected system's address book, and is an example of malware using social engineering to aid its spread. Once run, the worm overwrites files with its source code and attempts to spread to other computers.

The worm was created by Onel de Guzman, a dropout of AMA Computer College in the Philippines, because of his belief that internet access was a human right; the worm attempts to download a computer trojan that steals dial-up Internet access credentials to fulfill this aim. Philippine prosecutors ultimately dropped all charges against de Guzman because of a lack of laws against hacking in the country. In response, President Joseph Estrada signed an e-commerce law to cover against similar activity.

Affecting an estimated 10% of internet-connected computers at the time, the ILOVEYOU worm is considered to be one of the most virulent examples in the history of malware. The worm caused approximately US$10 billion worth of damages to numerous government agencies and corporations. It has inspired several creative works, including art installations, songs and films.

Background

The ILOVEYOU worm was coded by Onel de Guzman, a former student at AMA Computer College in the Philippines.

Editorial summary

“ILOVEYOU” enters the record as computer worm. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what ILOVEYOU, computer and worm can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—2000-05-04, 2000—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around ILOVEYOU, computer and worm.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“ILOVEYOU” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, ILOVEYOU, computer and worm provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q856096. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ILOVEYOU”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ILOVEYOU primary sources, ILOVEYOU archive and ILOVEYOU research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ILOVEYOU”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ILOVEYOU” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.