Ideachi Kalpana
2010 film directed by Sachin
Ideachi Kalpana (Devanagari: आयडियाची कल्पना; translation: The Conception of an Idea) is a 2010 Indian Marathi-language comedy film directed and produced by Sachin Pilgaonkar and written by Kshitij Zarapkar. The film was released in Maharashtra on 31 December 2010 and stars an ensemble cast of Sachin Pilgaonkar (in a triple role), Ashok Saraf, Mahesh Kothare, Bhargavi Chirmule, Nirmiti Sawant, Bhagyashree Rane and Kshitij Zarapkar. The film is a remake of Hindi film Lakhon Ki Baat (1984) which was itself a remake of English film The Fortune Cookie (1966). The film marks the collaboration of three legends in Marathi cinema after almost two decades.
Plot
Jairam Gangavane (Sachin Pilgaonkar) is an upcoming struggling actor whose older astrologer sister, Jaywanti (Nirmiti Sawant), believes that he is fated for royal living. Her husband, Advocate Manohar Barshinge (Ashok Saraf), is a lawyer but he is a fraud as one has to count the fingers of his own hand after a handshake with him. Manohar has not contested a single legal case in the court of law and prefers out-of-court settlements. One night, while returning home, Jairam gets hit by the Tata Grande car driven by his co-actress, Preeti (Bhargavi Chirmule). Preeti's older brother, Mahesh Thakur (Mahesh Kothare), is the Mumbai Police Commissioner and is married to Meena (Bhagyashree Rane). Preeti had taken the car of Mahesh during the time of the accident so the hit-and-run case becomes that of him.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ideachi Kalpana” as 2010 film directed by Sachin. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as 2010 film directed by Sachin. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5987902. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010, 1984 and 1966.
Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ideachi Kalpana”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ideachi Kalpana primary sources, Ideachi Kalpana archive and Ideachi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ideachi Kalpana”?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ideachi Kalpana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.