CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Ícolo e Bengo

city and municipality of Angola

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ291729
Source-derived summary

Ícolo e Bengo (English: Icolo and Bengo)

was a former municipality in the province of Luanda in Angola. It had a population of 81,144 in 2014. It was disestablished when the province of Icolo e Bengo was created in 2024.

History

As per decree 29/11, of 1 September 2011, which moved this municipality, along with the municipality of Quiçama from Bengo Province to Luanda Province. The others being Luanda, Belas, Cazenga, Cacuaco, Viana and Quiçama. The transfer documents were signed on 2 April 2012 in Catete by the governors of Luanda Province, Bento Bento, and João Miranda, of Bengo Province, in the presence of the minister for territorial administration, Bornito de Sousa.

The municipality was disestablished when the new province of Icolo e Bengo was created on 5 September 2024.

Geography

Overview

It covered an area of 3,059 square kilometres (1,181 sq mi) and its estimated population as of 2019 was 131,268.

Icolo e Bengo was bordered to the north and south respectively by the municipalities of Dande and Quiçama (in Bengo and Luanda provinces respectively), to the east by the municipality of Cambambe (Cuanza Norte province), and to the west by the municipalities of Viana and Cacuaco (both in Luanda province).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ícolo e Bengo” is city and municipality of Angola. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ícolo, Bengo and city, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 2024, 2011, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Ícolo, Bengo and city is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “city and municipality of Angola” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q291729. VIAF identifies the subject as 299741991. The Library of Congress control number is no2013040560. Authority coordinates are -9.113, 13.690. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2014, 2024, 2011 and 2012.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ícolo e Bengo”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ícolo e Bengo primary sources, Ícolo e Bengo archive and Ícolo research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ícolo e Bengo”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ícolo e Bengo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.