Ibn Sina Trust
non-profit welfare trust (organization) in Bangladesh and a major healthcare provider
Ibn Sina Trust is a non-profit welfare trust (organization) in Bangladesh and a major healthcare provider.
History
The Ibn Sina Trust was founded on 30 June 1980 in collaboration with the then Saudi Government. The then ambassador of Saudi Arabia in Bangladesh- his excellence Fouad Al Khatib and Advocate Mujibur Rahman, a Senior Advocate of Bangladesh Supreme Court and past provincial Information Minister of East Pakistan before the birth of Bangladesh, were two pioneer contributors in setting up the trust in Bangladesh. Ibn Sina Trust founded several laboratories, hospitals, diagnostic centers, consultation centers, and pharmaceutical industries throughout Bangladesh. On 30 April 2018, the Trust sold its shares in Islami Bank Bangladesh following a reshuffle of the bank administration. Ibn Sina has the biggest branch in Kallayanpur which serves at least 1,000 people per day.
The public source identifies “Ibn Sina Trust” as non-profit welfare trust (organization) in Bangladesh and a major healthcare provider. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Sina, Trust and non-profit.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ibn Sina Trust”, the useful work is to connect “non-profit welfare trust (organization) in Bangladesh and a major healthcare provider” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17065333. VIAF identifies the subject as 173192683. The Library of Congress control number is n2011182617. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1980 and 2018.
Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ibn Sina Trust”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ibn Sina Trust primary sources, Ibn Sina Trust archive and Sina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ibn Sina Trust”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ibn Sina Trust” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.