CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

IZh-56

type of double barreled shotgun

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ65129284
Source-derived summary

The IZh-56 «Belka» (ИЖ-56 «Белка») is a Soviet double-barreled combination gun.

History

IZh-56 was designed in 1956 and it was based on IZhK model.

Since 1961, a new varnish with improved characteristics has been used to protect the wooden parts of the gun.

In December 1964, the price of one standard IZh-56-3 was 45 roubles.

Design

IZh-56 is an over and under shotgun, with one barrel above the other.

It has a birch or beech stock and fore-end.

All IZh-56s have iron sights and they can be equipped with scope base for PVS-1 (ПВС-1) optical sight. The weight of PVS-1 scope without the scope base is 150 grams.

IZh-56-3 can be equipped with PO-2 (ПО-2) optical sight.

Variants

IZh-56-1 «Belka» (ИЖ-56-1 «Белка») - first model, since 1956 until 1958 31 903 guns were made.

Editorial summary

“IZh-56” enters the record as type of double barreled shotgun. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what IZh-56, type and double can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1956, 1961, 1964, 1958—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around IZh-56, type and double.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“IZh-56” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, IZh-56, type and double provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q65129284. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1956, 1961, 1964 and 1958.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “IZh-56”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow IZh-56 primary sources, IZh-56 archive and IZh-56 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “IZh-56”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from IZh-56” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.