CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ28452073 ↗
Source-derived summary

IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016) was a major professional wrestling event that was scripted and produced by the lucha libre wrestling company International Wrestling Revolution Group (IWRG; sometimes also referred to as Grupo Internacional Revolución in Spanish) that took place on August 3, 2016, in IWRG's home arena Arena Naucalpan in Naucalpan, State of Mexico, Mexico.

In the main event of the show, a Lucha de Apuestas or "bet match", Dragon Fly defeated Demonio Infernal, forcing him to unmask and reveal his real name, José Antonio Rojas. In the semi-final match Black Terry and Judas el Traidor furthered their own storyline feud as Judas el Traidor defeated Black Terry, leading to IWRG's Cabellera vs. Cabellera show two weeks later. The show featured three additional matches.

Production

Background

In Lucha libre the wrestling mask holds a sacred place, with the most anticipated and prestigious matches being those where a wrestler's mask is on the line, a so-called Lucha de Apuestas, or "bet match" where the loser would be forced to unmask in the middle of the ring and state their birth name. Winning a mask is considered a bigger accomplishment in lucha libre than winning a professional wrestling championship and usually draws more people and press coverage. Losing a mask is often a watershed moment in a wrestler's career, they give up the mystique and prestige of being an enmascarado (masked wrestler) but usually come with a higher than usual payment from the promoter.

Storylines

IWRG's August 2016 Máscara vs.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where IWRG, Máscara and August can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q28452073. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016) primary sources, IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016) archive and IWRG research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.