I–V–vi–IV progression
chord progression

The I–V–vi–IV chord progression or Axis progression (named after the Australian comedy rock band The Axis of Awesome, who popularized the chord progression's ubiquity), is a common chord progression popular across several music genres. It uses the I, V, vi, and IV chords of the diatonic scale. For example, in the key of C major, this progression would be C–G–Am–F. Rotations include:
I–V–vi–IV: C–G–Am–F
V–vi–IV–I: G–Am–F–C
vi–IV–I–V: Am–F–C–G
IV–I–V–vi: F–C–G–Am
The '50s progression uses the same chords but in a different order (I–vi–IV–V), no matter the starting point.
Variations
A common ordering of the progression, "vi–IV–I–V", was dubbed the "sensitive female chord progression" by Boston Globe columnist Marc Hirsh. In C major this would be Am–F–C–G, modulating the key to A minor.
Hirsh first noticed the chord progression in the song "One of Us" by Joan Osborne, and then other songs. He named the progression because he claimed it was used by many performers of the Lilith Fair in the late 1990s. Examples of the progression appeared in pop hits as early as the 1950s, such as in the Teddy Bears' "To Know Him Is to Love Him", written by Phil Spector.
Dan Bennett claims the progression is also called the "pop-punk progression" because of its frequent use in pop punk.
In this ordering, the progression ends with a double plagal cadence in the key of the dominant (in the Mixolydian mode) and could also be respelled ii–♭VII–IV–I, opening with a backdoor turnaround.
The public source identifies “I–V–vi–IV progression” as chord progression. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around progression and chord.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “I–V–vi–IV progression”, the useful work is to connect “chord progression” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3146453. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “I–V–vi–IV progression”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow I–V–vi–IV progression primary sources, I–V–vi–IV progression archive and progression research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “I–V–vi–IV progression”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “I–V–vi–IV progression” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.