CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

ISC2

non-profit organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ3153272
Source-derived summary

International Information System Security Certification Consortium, or ISC2, is a non-profit organization which specializes in training and professional certifications for cybersecurity professionals.

History

In the mid-1980s, a need for a standardized, vendor-neutral certification program for information security professionals was identified. In November 1988, the Data Processing Management Association's Special Interest Group for Computer Security (SIG-CS) brought together several organizations to form a consortium to address this need. This led to the formation of ISC2 in mid-1989 as a non-profit organization.

The first working committee to establish a Common Body of Knowledge (CBK) was formed in 1990, and the first version of the CBK was finalized in 1992. This work laid the foundation for the organization's first certification, the Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), which was launched in 1994.

The organization continued to expand its certification offerings over the years:

The Systems Security Certified Practitioner (SSCP) was introduced in 2001.

The Certified in Governance, Risk and Compliance (CGRC) was launched in 2023.

The Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional (CSSLP) was introduced in 2008.

The Certified Cloud Security Professional (CCSP), co-developed with the Cloud Security Alliance, was launched in 2015.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “ISC2” as non-profit organization. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1988, 1989, 1990, 1992—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1988. The account is most persuasive where ISC2, non-profit and organization can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as non-profit organization. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3153272. VIAF identifies the subject as 145263790. The Library of Congress control number is nb2008011505. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1992.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ISC2”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ISC2 primary sources, ISC2 archive and ISC2 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ISC2”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ISC2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.