CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

IBRC commission of investigation

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ22084009
Source-derived summary

The IBRC commission of investigation was an Irish government commission of investigation to look into the transactions of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC) that led to its failure.

The commission was established by the Oireachtas under the Commission of Investigation (Irish Bank Resolution Corporation) Order 2015 passed by Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann on 10 June 2015 to investigate transactions of IBRC.

It was composed of the chairperson and sole member, originally Mr Justice Daniel O'Keeffe, and subsequently Judge Brian Cregan. The original Chairperson Mr. Justice O’Keeffe informed the Government that, for personal reasons, he was unable to continue to act as chairperson of the commission; he was replaced by Judge Brian Cregan, a judge of the High Court.

Terms of Reference

The commission's term of reference were to investigate all transactions by IBRC between 21 January 2009 and 7 February 2013 which resulted in a capital loss to IBRC of at least €10,000,000 (either in one or more transactions relating to the same borrower). It shall also investigate all transactions which might give rise to public concern in respect of the ultimate returns to the taxpayer.

Further details of the terms of reference are set out in the Commission of Investigation (Irish Bank Resolution Corporation) Order 2015. It did not only examine transactions relating to the acquisition of assets by the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA).

However the terms of reference were very broad and the commission had a great degree of discretion as to the transactions it could investigate. The Minister for Finance stated in the Dail that "the commission will have the power to investigate any transaction of any value that gives rise or is likely to give rise to potential public concerns, regardless of the level of loss", including verbal agreements and was apparently not confined to the time-limits in the terms of reference.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “IBRC commission of investigation” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around IBRC, commission and investigation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2009, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with IBRC, commission and investigation providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “IBRC commission of investigation”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q22084009. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2009 and 2013.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “IBRC commission of investigation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow IBRC commission of investigation primary sources, IBRC commission of investigation archive and IBRC research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “IBRC commission of investigation”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from IBRC commission of investigation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.