CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Code page 1019

computer character set for Dutch

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ30591611 ↗
Source-derived summary

Code Page 1019 (CCSID 1019), also known as CP1019, is the code page for the Dutch version of ISO 646. It is roughly equivalent to ASCII, differing only in replacing the tilde with a macron.

It should not be confused with the significantly different Code page 1102, which also complies with the ISO 646 invariant structure, and is the Dutch version of DEC's National Replacement Character Set (NRCS).

Editorial summary

“Code page 1019” enters the record as computer character set for Dutch. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Code, page and computer can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1019, 1102—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Code, page and computer.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Code page 1019” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Code, page and computer provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30591611. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1019 and 1102.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Code page 1019”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Code page 1019 primary sources, Code page 1019 archive and Code research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Code page 1019”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Code page 1019” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.