CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Gonionota anisodes

species of moth

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ25095142
Source-derived summary

Gonionota anisodes is a moth in the family Depressariidae. It was described by Edward Meyrick in 1916. It is found in French Guiana and Brazil.

The wingspan is 16–17 millimetres (0.63–0.67 in). The forewings are ochreous brown, somewhat lighter and yellowish-tinged towards the dorsum and termen. There is a darker brown streak along the dorsum from one-fourth to three-fourths. A faint violet-whitish dot is found on the costa at two-fifths, and a fine indistinct oblique whitish strigula at three-fourths. The first discal stigma is minute and blackish, the second very small and white. The hindwings are grey.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Gonionota anisodes” is species of moth. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Gonionota, anisodes and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1916—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Gonionota, anisodes and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of moth” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25095142. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1916.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gonionota anisodes”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gonionota anisodes primary sources, Gonionota anisodes archive and Gonionota research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gonionota anisodes”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Gonionota anisodes” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.