Tetration
repeated or iterated exponentiation

In mathematics, tetration (or hyper-4) is an operation based on iterated, or repeated, exponentiation. There is no universal notation for tetration, though Knuth's up arrow notation
a
↑↑
n
{\displaystyle a\uparrow \uparrow n}
and the left-exponent
n
a
{\displaystyle {}^{n}a}
are common.
Under the definition as repeated exponentiation,
n
a
{\displaystyle {^{n}a}}
means
a
⋅
⋅
a
a
{\displaystyle {a^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{a^{a}}}}}}
, where n copies of a are iterated via exponentiation right-to-left, i.e. the application of exponentiation
n
−
1
{\displaystyle n-1}
times. The number n is called the height of the function, while a is called the base, analogous to exponentiation. It is read as "the n-th tetration of a". For example, 2 tetrated to 4 (or the fourth tetration of 2) is
4
2
=
2
(
2
(
2
2
)
)
=
2
(
2
4
)
=
2
16
=
65536
{\displaystyle {^{4}2}=2^{(2^{(2^{2})})}=2^{(2^{4})}=2^{16}=65536}
.
Tetration is the hyperoperation after exponentiation and before pentation. Along with the other hyperoperations, tetration is used for the notation of very large numbers. The name was coined by Reuben Goodstein from the prefix tetra- (meaning "four") and the word "iteration".
“Tetration” enters the record as repeated or iterated exponentiation. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tetration, repeated and iterated can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Tetration” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tetration, repeated and iterated provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q194324. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Tetration”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Tetration primary sources, Tetration archive and Tetration research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tetration”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Tetration” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.