Hur Do-hwan
South Korean baseball player

Hur Do-hwan (Korean: 허도환; born July 31, 1984) is a South Korean former professional baseball catcher. He played in the KBO League for the Doosan Bears, Nexen Heroes, Hanwha Eagles, SK Wyverns, KT Wiz, and LG Twins. He bats and throws right-handed.
Amateur career
After graduating from Seoul High School, Hur was drafted by the Doosan Bears in the second round (63rd overall) of the 2003 KBO League draft. Hur did not sign with them; instead he opted for college, attending Dankook University. Hur was a four-year starting catcher for Dankook University from 2003 to 2006. As a senior in 2006, Hur was selected for the South Korea national baseball team and competed in the friendly baseball series against the United States national baseball team. In the series, Hur played in two games as a starting catcher. In Game 1, Huh went 2-for-3 with an RBI and 2 runs. In that game, he hit a double in the third inning and a solo home run in the fifth inning off 2006 Collegiate Baseball Player of the Year winner and future Diamondbacks' prospect Wes Roemer.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Hur Do-hwan” as south Korean baseball player. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as south Korean baseball player. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11285903. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1984, 2003 and 2006.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hur Do-hwan”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hur Do-hwan primary sources, Hur Do-hwan archive and Do-hwan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hur Do-hwan”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hur Do-hwan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.